Others with raw skin hanging in flaps around their hips leaped shrieking into waterways to escape the heat. That respite was tragically short-lived. Second, it must be a city primarily devoted to military production.
It was created to destroy and kill on a massive scale. On other occasions, Truman claimed that Hiroshima was bombed because it was an industrial center.
Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki strategically ended the war with Japan, and prevented more loss of life due to bombings, invasions and acrimonious warfare. Would that then have justified shooting tens of thousands of German civilians, including women and children? Fuller, who was similarly scathing on the terror-bombing of the German cities, characterized the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as "a type of war that would have disgraced Tamerlane.
He even raised the possibility that, as part of the terms, Japan might be allowed to hold on to Formosa Taiwan and Korea. Demonstration of the Atomic Bomb on an Unpopulated Area Another option was to demonstrate the power of atomic bomb to frighten the Japanese into surrendering.
We can see no acceptable alternative to direct military use.
A sea change had taken place in the attitudes of the American people. This is true also of Nagasaki. While the mass media parroted the government line in praising the atomic incinerations, prominent conservatives denounced them as unspeakable war crimes.
The only language they seem to understand is the one we have been using to bombard them. Hans Adolf Jacobsen and Arthur S. Among the Allied terms, to which "there are no alternatives," was that there be "eliminated for all time the authority and influence of those who have deceived and misled the people of Japan into embarking on world conquest [sic].
In this way, the war might have ended quickly, saving the lives of many Allied soldiers. A laizze-faire approach seemed reasonable, as the US was, for all intents and purposes, insulated from the violence.
This was a new weapon, not clearly understood. Pearl Harbor was a military base. However, this violent act must be registered in context to the larger violence at hand, and be understood as a desperate act to end the bloodshed. Casualties on Okinawa were 35 percent; one out of three US participants was wounded or killed.
Despite knowing the cause was hopeless, Japan planned a resistance so ferocious, resulting in costs so appalling, that they hoped that the United States would simply call for a cease fire where each nation would agree to stop fighting and each nation would retain the territory they occupied at the time.
However, there have been a few instances in history when violence to many was justified. First, who would Japan select to evaluate the demonstration and advise the government?
Eyre and Spottiswoode,p. A committee of politicians? Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
Though to save life is laudable, it in no way justifies the employment of means which run counter to every precept of humanity and the customs of war.Was Truman Justified in dropping the atom bomb?
Essay by mpagri, High School, 11th grade, A, September President Harry S. Truman - unexpectedly thrust into the position of Chief of Command - was confronted with the raging World War II and the creation of this new mystery weapon.
the bomb on Japan. I personally respect the 5/5(1). The United States will always try to avoid the loss of American civilians at all costs, even if that means taking lives of another countries innocent civilians.
A huge proponent to the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9 of was President Harry Truman. When President Harry Truman made the call to drop two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world was forever changed.
despite the massive destruction of Japan under allied “carpet bombing,” no surrender was forthcoming. We will write a custom essay sample on Truman and the Atomic Bomb specifically for you.
for only. - President Harry Truman’s use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during the Second World War is the most controversial decision in history.
While it was an undoubtedly difficult decision, it was indeed necessary in order to end this six-year war that had ravaged the world. Truman doubtless was aware of this, so from time to time he advanced other pretexts.
On August 9,he stated, "The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians."3.
This, however, is absurd. Today is the 61st anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki.
(The bomb had been dropped on Hiroshima on the 6th.) Catholic philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe protested and wrote an essay explaining her objections called "Mr.