The difference between the eulogies shows us the importance of style of speech. This was a lenient punishment considering the military culture of the time in which lower-ranking military officers who disobeyed their superiors were more often than not hanged.
The most notable affairs that these men had as Roman rulers were those with Cleopatra, the Queen of Egypt at the time. To round off he challenges anyone to say that they loved Caesar more than Rome herself.
The Roman nobility could have hardly resisted any invasion by either or both of their enemies. He did not want to side with the conspirators whom he valued slightly.
He sounds very sincere when he says, "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious Antony was looked down upon by all the conspirators except for Brutus. Rome began to collapse once Caesar was killed, and Antony was left without anyone to trust. He starts out by addressing the crowd as "Friends" because he wants to come to them as a friend rather than a ruler trying to gain power.
Brutus began by stating his case for killing Caesar; the crowd was confused and curious as to the reason for his death. It was carried on by Antony and Octavian instead. For Brutus is an honorable man.
He justifies his actions by saying that he loved Caesar but, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.
The patrician clan, or gen, was a member of the original aristocracy of Rome that had governed it since the 4th century. He was alone in making this oration, yet he was confidant in himself and courageous.
Brutus persuaded the others not to add to the assassination by saying, "And for Mark Antony, think not of him: As a matter of fact, both men sired children with Cleopatra although at different times.
He poses the question, "Who is here so base that would be a bondman? This gives him common ground with the crowd, who also remember the things that Antony speaks of. Julius Caesar and Mark Antony did not only share a distinction as the greatest Roman conquerors; both are also known for their explicit involvement in illicit affairs especially foreign women - some of whom were married.
This encourages the crowd to believe him, as an honorable man. This indirect way of showing the crowd his feelings makes his speech more effective; the crowd is guided but not forced to his reasons.
He is able to get the people to question the rightness of killing Caesar. The people became excited and rowdy when he teased them about the will, waving it in the air and pretending as if he was not going to read it.
The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.
Therefore he joined the Second Triumvirate and became a great leader. Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. They wanted to kill Antony as well as Caesar because they feared that he would become as powerful as him and possibly a dictator.
He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen. He then says, "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him. This gives him a connection with the emotion that the crowd is feeling at the death of Caesar.
In justifying Caesar and disproving Brutus, the people see Antony as a potential successor to Caesar. This victory impressed Caesar, and he would later leave Antony in charge of the peninsular when he left for the military campaign to conquer Spain Toynbee, Antony is ultimately the better orator because of his understanding of the crowd.
Reverse psychology is used when he first pretends to respect the conspirators calling them honorable men, and then slowly proving that they are not.
He masters the use of emotion, subtlety and logic. He accomplishes his objective of convincing the plebeians that Brutus is a traitor. Conclusion Although Julius Caesar and Mark Antony share many notable similarities in a host of aspects, the two legendary war generals and political leaders of ancient Rome and the western part of the Old World at large differ in as many respects.
Even though Julii Caesares were believed to have been founded by the goddess Venus, the family was distinct in that it was humble and was progressive as opposed to being conservative. Suicide and sovereignty in Antony and Cleopatra. Anyone who was ambitious would never have done any such things.
This was partly because members of the gen were relatively poor Toynbee, The two men would extend their unison in the war front throughout the period of the civil war between Caesar and Pompey, which broke out in 49 BC.
He speaks out against them because he wanted power for himself, and unlike Brutus, he is politically ambitious and so believes that if he can take control while the state is in turmoil, he will remain in power.Professionally written essays on this topic: Julius Caesar Mark Antony Comparative Analysis of Characters Mark Antony and Caius Cassius in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar.
Comparative Essay on the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus Julius Caesar is one of Shakespeare’s greatest works - Julius Ceasar - Comparative Essay on the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus introduction. It is about a group of conspirators in Rome who kill their king, Julius Caesar.
The play follows the life of Brutus. Mark Antony is one of the most famous people of Roman history. He was one of the most superior generals and a crucial statesman in his time.
A comrade and patron of Julius Caesar, Antony was an ideal military tactician and leader of the people. He was a man who started out for the people but. Julius Caesar_Mark Antonys Speech Brutus vs.
Antony Speech Analysis Comparison of the Themes of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" and the novel "The Lord of the Flies". The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience that they are given to, but rhetorical devices were used in different ways in order for each to have an effect on the people of Rome.
Brutus and Mark Antony Speech Comparison. or any similar topic. Julius Caesar - Mark Antony Essay - Mark Antony The character of Mark Antony from Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar may be viewed as simply the confident and devoted supporter of Julius Caesar.
On the contrary, Antony presents the qualities of a shrewd flatterer, a .Download