FedEx is the most reliable in our experience since Though the company is entitled for some compensation due to the inconveniences Basinger Main line v basinger essay them with her rejection, it is unadvisable to determine the amounts as if the film had been shot and run on cinema screens.
Main Line is also not entitled to the differential profit loss by comparing Basinger films to Fenn films. The press was awash with stories declaiming the lack of integrity in Hollywood deals and discussing the possible adverse implications for actors and production companies in general.
Glaser, Attorney at Law: Both Main Line and Basinger presented expert witnesses to deal with the problem. However, I do not agree with the decision of jury to award 7. After all, Main Line was only paying Ms. Basinger had been in negotiation with Main Line to star in the film, "Boxing Helena" but had withdrawn from the project.
Important management accounting techniques, such as contribution analysis and relevant costing, are integral to the widely publicized case of Main Line Pictures vs. Wilde worked form the definition that damages were "a measure of the compensation that would be required to put the person [ who was breached] in the position [he] would gave been in had there not been a breach in terms of the economic losses to [him]…" Wilde simply compared what Main Line expected to make with Basinger to what Main Line actually was able to make on the same package without Basinger -- the difference presumably a loss was the damage to Main Line.
They will then give you a form to fill out with a BLUE border. Of concern here is how to value the actual damages incurred by Main Line if there were a breach of contract.
Of course the time frame to receive your paper might be extended as we have to wait for the payment to arrive. Nobody ever said that.
Therefore, as I have already stipulated, the amount of compensation should be based on domestic presales, which amount to 2. Nobody is saying Miss Basinger has to act in this movie.
While direct costs are charged to the individual film projects as incurred job order costingthere can be common overhead costs that will require allocation to individual films. Although Kim Basinger is liable for the lost amount listed above, is she also liable for the 2.
The press was awash with stories declaiming the lack of integrity in Hollywood deals and discussing the possible adverse implications for actors and production companies in general. Finally, the reader is asked to prepare his or her own alternative lost profit calculation.
Custom papers will processed, then written and delivered based on the time frame originally selected and paid for. Therefore, the general conclusion that I have drawn about the case is that Basinger should be held liable but for smaller sum as a significant portion of it is based on suppositions and roughly estimated and highly biased numbers, which cannot serve as a basis for court decision.
The case relies heavily on the identification of relevant costs and the performance of sensitivity analysis as the reader is asked to consider alternative cost and revenue assumptions to ascertain the impact on the lost profit amount. Basinger case, the primary issue for jurists and other legal enthusiasts was whether Basinger breached an actual contractual agreement or simply engaged in the usual caprice of Hollywood deal making.
Right from your own neighborhood store, you can send us a cash payment and get an instant receipt for it! Therefore, it is advisable to stick to the amount of pre-sale profits as the determining compensation sum.
Yet another question has to be considered: However, as in my opinion it is too optimistic to calculate total profits before the film has even been shot, it seems reasonable to me to stop on the presale amount as the one which can be demanded for compensation, so with some implications it would be logical to set it at 3 million.
Basinger argued that only a handful of very successful films could generate profits to Main Line in the dollar amounts cited because of the many contractual claims against those profits by others.Inthe case of Main Line Pictures, Inc.
verses actress Kim Basinger for breach of contract, the controversy with negotiations between Basinger and Main Line Pictures is an excellent example of the importance for accurate cost-profit decision making. expected to make with Basinger to what Main Line actually was able to make on the same package without Basinger — the difference (presumably a loss) was the damage to Main Line.
Main Line vs Basinger The case of Main Line vs Basinger was introduced in court in and deals with Basinger refusing from acting in the film “Boxing Helena” which had not been shot afterwards – Main Line claims it was precisely because Basinger rejected the leading role after a preliminary agreement - Main.
Kim Basinger mainline vs. basinger Although the accidental tourist is apparently a comedy it is at heart a quite serious debate over competing views of life it's self.
The Hudson's Bay Company Hudson Taylor Documentary films have played an important part in determining the way we construct history and memory.
basinger, boxing helena and law suit This 5-page paper focuses on Main Line's lawsuit against actress Kim Basinger for her refusal to participate in the movie "Boxing Helena." Bibliography lists 5 sources.
to “loan-out” the services of Basinger to Main Line. It provided, inter alia, that Main Line was entitled to seek equitable relief if artist breached and employer was to indemnify producer if artist made any claim for compensation.
Employer warranted that it was a duly organized and Main Line Pictures, Inc. v. Basinger Opinion.Download